Fascism Essays (641 words) - World War II, Politics,

Fascism Fascism "President Roosevelt recognized the dangers of fascism early and did all that he could, under the circumstances, to lead the nation away form a policy of isolationism." When the war broke out, there was no way that the world could possibly know the severity of it. Fortunately, one country saw and understood that Germany and its allies would have to be stopped. America's involvement in World War II not only contributed to the eventual downfall of the insane Adolph Hitler and his Third Reich, but it also came that the precise time and moment. Had the United States entered the war any earlier, the consequences could have been worse. There are several different incidents where President Roosevelt showed this philosophy through some of his actions. The Munich agreement is the first of many instances where Roosevelt and the issue of isolationism are tested. It started as a conference on September 29, with Eduard Daladier from France, Neville Chamberlain from England, Mussolini from Italy, and Hitler in attendance. The agreement that was eventually signed by France, Germany, Great Britain, and Germany "stipulated that the evacuation of the Sutedenland will begin on October 1st and be completed by October 10th." (Lipson, 408) Chamberlain thought that he had achieved peace, "but the Agreement quickly became a symbol of the western powers' appeasement to Hitler." (Internet) "Hitler gained all that he had asked for, and Chamberlain went home deluded into believing he had purchased peace." (Sulzberger, 50) The British people didn't like this agreement too much, feeling that they had "surrendered to the threat of force." (Lipson, 408) Hitler said at that conference that Rhineland would be the last place that he would invade. This was, in fact, a complete lie. It was his eventual invasion of Poland in 1939 that brought upon the full-scale war. As the problems increased in Europe, people were afraid that the whole problem would wind up spreading over to the United States. This was the last thing that we would want to happen, having just come out of the depression and all. The Neutrality Act of 1937, which embargoed arms to belligerent nations, was repealed, and"arms exports were put on a "cash and carry" basis, to the advantage of the Allies, who controlled the seas." (Sulzberger, 134) This was declared by the Neutrality Act of 1939. It basically said European democracies could purchase American materials, only on the account that they pay cash and transport them on their own ships. This act basically removed us from the neutral position, and put us in on the side of the Allies. The Destroyers for Bases Deal was another way that Roosevelt removed the United States from neutrality. The U.S. took the initiative to help the British out on September 3, 1939, "when fifty overage destroyers were transferred to England, in return for American rights to build bases in British possessions in the Caribbean and the western Atlantic." (Sulzberger, 134) The destroyers that were traded to the British were old World War I types, "but still able to fight Nazi U-boats." (Sulzberger, 134) The U.S. was back into a corner when Churchill told Roosevelt "the perilous position which the United States would occupy if British resistance collapsed and Hitler became master of Europe, with all its dockyards and navies." (Churchill, 107) With that thought in mind, Roosevelt basically had no choice but to aid the Allies in their time of war. If Hitler gained control of Europe, his power would eventually spread to all other parts of the world. Roosevelt was backed into a corner with all of these conditions, and he really had no choice but to initially aid the Allies, and eventually fight on their side. Hitler in control would have caused many problems, and it was the last thing that the world needed. He was an insane person that had no place in control of anything, let alone a country. He managed to condition the people that he led into doing what he wanted them to do, and they did it without questioning him, for fear of death.

Carters Paper

Carters Paper Carters Paper Carter Luedtke Mr. Bakker English 9 7 May 2013 Fighting: Not Always the Answer We all love to have fights, but sometimes it isn’t the answer especially when there are lives at stake. Romeo and Juliet shows a lot of examples of fighting that don’t end in very good terms. The fighting between the two families had a big effect because of course they lost several lives that could have been avoided. There are also many examples of this kind of conflict now a days with gangs all around the globe. The two families are basically a gang in a fantasy world so they could relate to the unnecessary fighting. Romeo and Juliet is relevant today because it shows fighting isn’t always the answer. In the story, all of the fighting between the two families was obviously a feud that happened in the past. The two families were probably once good friends, but something happened and they somehow couldn't let the past go. The fighting between the Capulets and Montagues lost 5 lives. Romeo, Juliet, Mercutio, Montagues Wife, and Pari s were all victims in this pointless fighting. a religious man Friar Laurence even said, â€Å"But come, young waverer, come, go with me, In one respect I'll thy assistant be; For this alliance may so happy prove, To turn your households' rancour to pure love.(2.3.9),† which basically means that even he thinks that the fighting is not the answer and they should be united. If they never had a feud in the first place, Romeo and Juliet didn't have to hide their love for eachother. Fighting in the story was in fact solved by the deaths, but the deaths are still more extraordinary than the feud. The Prince even told the two families about their actions and how the life of their relatives are more important. The Prince said, â€Å"Where be these enemies? Capulet! Montague!See, what a scourge is laid upon your hate,That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love.And I for winking at your discords too Have lost a brace of kinsmen: all are punished.† (5.3.291). The famili es even got punished for their actions which is very much like todays system with gangs and other types of family clans. Gangs now a days are more than likely to get punished for whatever they do that is troublesome. Like in Romeo and Juliet you could argue that the families are the cause of death of Romeo, Juliet. Paris, Montagues Wife, and Benvolio. When you get thrown in jail for fighting, is the